IceDrift issueshttps://gitlab.awi.de/floenavi-crs/icedrift/-/issues2022-06-10T11:59:34Zhttps://gitlab.awi.de/floenavi-crs/icedrift/-/issues/3Make it clearer when data is extrapolated2022-06-10T11:59:34ZStefan HendricksMake it clearer when data is extrapolatedThe current implementation does not handle cases of data outside the temporal coverage of the reference station data. E.g. the method `PositionDataBase.resample_to_time` ([Link](https://gitlab.awi.de/floenavi-crs/icedrift/-/blob/81399587...The current implementation does not handle cases of data outside the temporal coverage of the reference station data. E.g. the method `PositionDataBase.resample_to_time` ([Link](https://gitlab.awi.de/floenavi-crs/icedrift/-/blob/8139958775ff9fe38505595aede651301aa0a475/icedrift/__init__.py#L113)) handles interpolation in some way, but without giving feedback to the user.
Option to improve on this situation to be investigated:
- [ ] Display log entries in case of extrapolation
- [ ] Add an option to raise an exception if extrapolation is not specifically activated by keyword call or within an allowed period.Stefan HendricksStefan Hendrickshttps://gitlab.awi.de/floenavi-crs/icedrift/-/issues/1More graceful exit for missing reference station data2020-07-14T07:37:45ZStefan HendricksMore graceful exit for missing reference station dataGaps in the reference station data within its general time coverage are currently not handled but cause an exception in the interpolation.
Add a test for actual reference station data coverage and provide a meaningful responseGaps in the reference station data within its general time coverage are currently not handled but cause an exception in the interpolation.
Add a test for actual reference station data coverage and provide a meaningful responseStefan HendricksStefan Hendricks